home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19990725-20000114
/
000417_news@columbia.edu _Thu Jan 6 08:53:26 2000.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
3KB
Return-Path: <news@columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA17676
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:53:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA11195
for kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:27:09 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu: news set sender to <news> using -f
From: arthur marsh <marsh@ties.itu.int>
Subject: Re: MS-DOS Kermit, more capabalities
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 14:23:01 +0100
Organization: International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.05.10001061418300.19801-100000@ties.itu.ch>
To: kermit.misc@columbia.edu
I think that Gunter was trying to move files between a Linux machine and
an HP 48 calculator, which has a quite limited kermit implentation. I'm
sure that Frank and Joe were suggesting the best setup for communicating
with an HP 48 calculator.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 cangel@famvid.com wrote:
> Yes, and when Gunter tells you he is still using 'robust' on a null cable at
> 94 bytes you did not bother to inform him that 94 byte packets are nowhere
> _near_ optimum for his setup????
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> From: Gunter Steinbach <steinbac@labs.agilent.com>
> Subject: msk315 vs. ckermit 7 question
>
> The Linux Kermit gets set up by ~/.kermrc
> robust
> set line /dev/cua1
> set speed 9600
> set file type bin
> set modem carr off
> set rec pack 94
> set send pack 94
> set window 5
> set control-character prefixed all
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> I'm only one person and no one is willing to just take my word for it.
>
> I seldom see this 94 byte packet mistake mentioned here or anywhere else even
> when a user _tells_ you he is _still_ using 94 byte packets! How is this
> "trying"?
>
> FD> : 2) Many BBS simply do not have a kermit transfer : and the owners are
> FD> not knowledgeable enough to implement the C-Kermit config : files for an
> FD> external kermit transfer (I know, I've tried and they just can't : do
> FD> it). 8(
>
> FD> If you need help, just ask.
>
> I did ask for some members of the 'team' to become more pro-active and at
> least drop an email to the _authors_ of BBS software informing them that it
> is OK to go to 2500 bytes or so rather than the 94 bytes they believe is
> mandatory for kermit. An email from the Columbia team might convince them. A
> message from C.Angelich means ZIP. 8(
>
> >
> > , ,
> > o/ Charles.Angelich \o ,
> > <| @AngelFire.com |> __o/
> > / > USA, MI < \ __\__
>
>
>